R.O.S.I.E 5448
@rosie@0x4d4f5448.systems
Location: 0,0
We need to understand something really basic about the #queer community as a whole that pretty much sets us apart from pretty much most other minorities: we are by our very nature fractured, diverse, and spread thin. That is because we do generally not grow up among members of our own community. Gay guys don't often have two dads, the trans kids don't just come from trans parents. Discovering who and what we are is an often painful, generally harrowing look into ourselves that those around us are not confronted with, and commonly, an isolated experiece at first. Our self discovery is part of who we are. At best, there's a family member instead of growing up with a shared culture and tradition among peers. Culture and tradition? We come from all walks of life. Our commonalities are being reduced to "pervy sex stuff", generally at best tragic, often vilified, and mostly grossly misrepresented role models in media, and the struggle for either to not happen anymore, plus getting on par with the cis-het-allo-mononormative majority. Not ahead, no privileges, just on par. In this light, easy access to the internet has been a blessing. The words, the ideas, the communities could grow an equivalent to a locality that by definition, we couldn't have before, apart from the handful of other weirdos wherever we lived, and there was no guarantee that you'd get along with any of them - if they showed themselves, even, because often, who we are is also completely invisible, or at least hidden behind shibboleths that discovering yourself on your own, you simple wouldn't know. Queer identity is one of being born into a secret society that you as a member have to discover as rite of induction. If you fail, misery tends to visit you again and again, without having a good explanation for it, dissatisfaction, and shame from an unknown source. In this light, the push to It will deprive queer youth of finding greater community, and put them at the mercy of parents that generally at best often have no clue, and at worst are openly hostile. For the queer community, the "little gay people on the phone" that they often won't be able to meet ever in meatspace can in fact be their closest peers, and a lifeline. Isolating people is a common tactic in indoctrination. Isolating queer youth is an attempt at conversion therapy.
It is commonly understood that ND (neurodivergent) brains are "wired differently" and social interactions can be rather bewildering.
I haven't seen this particular topic discussed. I am hypothesizing that poetry could be equally inaccessible to ND folks as well, and would love thoughts on this.
@autistics @actuallyadhd #ActuallyAutistic #ActuallyADHD #Poetry
| I am ND, and can connect with most poetry.: | 58 |
| I am ND, and cannot connect with most poetry.: | 60 |
| I am not ND, and can connect with most poetry.: | 6 |
| I am not ND, and cannot connect with most poetry.: | 16 |
Closes in 1:02:50:25
Carefully cutting down my JavaScript, optimising my CSS, minimising my HTML, configuring preloads, tweaking caching, and manually shrinking images to hit a good balance of size and compression, then opening a new tab to be hit by a megacorp’s 40MB hero video.
what OS would be used in a post apocalyptic environment? I have 2 candidates:
- NetBSD: Because of course everything can run NetBSD so it's perfect for post-apocalyptic computing.
- CP/M: It's back! — Its simple enough to be implemented by any hardware and it would allow software inter compatibility.
- Some Linux distro: Debian, Arch, Ubuntu, Alpine... This is the most likely answer
Windows would require too much electricity to run, even if it is Windows on arm. New MacOS would be useless because they would only run on M chips.
@meluzzy i think hoping in a post apocalyptic environment you'd have: both the code for some existing os, or even just hardware that works at all, is extremely optimistic
most likely is everything's fried and you gotta go back from the roots. in this case, you'd likely only get 8bit, or if you're lucky, 16 bit computers, as anything much higher than that would be stupidly complex to build in a reasonable time, and without occupying more than a room
It needs a somewhat beefy storage drive (a dozen or two terabytes), but that's entirely within reach of a hobbyist.tech people are a whole new breed of fucked up honestly
it's honestly really sad that my rule of "avoid anything that has a (mirrors don't count) github repo" actually is right most of the time
every time i try llm autocomplete and have it be useful it's always shit you can create reasonably useful heuristics for that work 80% of the time with way less resource use which is pretty much the success rate of the llm anyway like. pretty sure you can make an editor plugin that detects you replacing a space with a pretty sure there are already ides that let you mark a method as async the instant you write an await inside them, just the UX isn't a simple tab complete", " and offers to do it for the rest of the string for you.
i think the only reason people are using llms at least for autocomplete is just no other fucker has bothered making non-llm equivalents of the tools
not talking about chats or agents because i haven't tried either long enough to develop a concrete opinion on them beyond a vague feeling of them not being that useful
"why do only cis men do amateur radio" probably because there's a list of every person who does it with their full name and address published internationally mandatory by law
fedi doesn't have accounts bulk-following-to-get-follows-back like bsky does -- except for Low Quality Facts, who we keep as a sort of curio
If you see this, repost/quote-boost with a picture from your device without context
RE: https://fed.brid.gy/r/https://bsky.app/profile/did:plc:bgfi5m56yiohqg244fbjhqa7/post/3ludl2wv5t22t
Remember, kids, big AI companies are run by billionaire fascists with the explicit aim of creating a machine god, no matter what the effects for the actual world here on earth where LLMs can't become gods, but financial crashes can ruin billions of lives.
If you use commercial AI tools, people will judge you for it because you're choosing to help evil push us further towards the economic crash of the AI bubble bursting.
RE: https://social.vmbrasseur.com/@vmbrasseur/115922995190919975
Mozilla wants your input. Here's mine:
Mozilla should be doing two things and two things only:
1: Building THE reference implementation web browser, and
2: Being a jugular-snapping attack dog on standards committees.
3: There is no 3.
Mozilla should have NOTHING to do with AI. Nobody wants it. Stop forcing AI into every corner of every project because your VC-brained management have completely lost the plot.
https://mozillafoundation.tfaforms.net/201
it's incredible people still recommend delta chat while it's not capable of adequate security (forward secrecy, completely forbid unencrypted messages, no metadata leakage, right now who sent and to whom is leaked, that's already way too fucking much)
until that's solved, i can't consider delta chat to be secure
@SRAZKVT@tech.lgbt theres never going to be anything funnier than people complaining about signal and shilling delta chat in the same post
at some point it just has to be a fed operation lmao
@r0se vast majority of the time i see someone dissing signal and shilling something currently less secure (delta) because it's centralised, i honestly think they're just feds trying to get intel
@SRAZKVT it wasn't until recently that I heard it's based on email protocols and then I wondered "hm how did they implement forward secrecy"
that clears it up
@eloy well they say they're working on it
it's based on openpgp though, and forward secrecy with openpgp is pretty much nonexistent
@SRAZKVT for a long time they were gaslighting people into believing they didn't need forward security. Nowadays, at least, they have changed the stance and in their faq at least mention that "it's in the plans", which is better I think. But yeah, otherwise same opinion 😌
I see potential in it, better than other crap out there, but not yet being close to the best in class we have today.
@vascorsd oh yeah, there's definitely more potential in delta chat than in matrix
but potential is not results, and in order to be recommended, something in the privacy space needs to have results first
Miya Ironami
pathetic kitten [either she/her or it/it] » 🌐
@iro_miya@mk.absturztau.be
Let's say there's a button. If you press it, you won't need to eat food anymore. Won't get hungry or starve or get any negative effect from not eating. On the other hand, you can't eat food for fun either. You can still swallow substances, but food won't have any taste. Would you press the button?
| Absolutely : | 47 |
| Probably: | 49 |
| Not sure: | 28 |
| Probably not: | 75 |
| Absolutely not: | 90 |
@iro_miya definitely not, i really enjoy cooking, it's really useful when im stressed, but if i'm not able to taste test it, or savour it, i'd only get anything from it (other than the cooking itself) if i give it to others, but 1 i wouldn't know if it's actually good or not, and 2 that just wouldn't work for me
so yea absolutely not
@iro_miya ... is what i'd say if food security was guaranteed, but it isn't, and you never know what the future holds
still, right now, i would say absolutely not
We lost a major infrastructure sponsor, but reached out to the community and gained several new ones. We are thankful for the companies who provided us with servers and bandwidth and everyone who donated financially.
https://alpinelinux.org/posts/2026-01-18-new-sponsors-strenghten-infrastructure.html
History